Agreement Termination Clause In India

Apr 8th, 2021 | By | Category: Uncategorized

The employment contract had a clause stipulating that the worker`s benefits could be terminated by a salary of three months or a period of three months. The interviewee Brojo Nath ended by making him a three-month salary with a dismissal. The Supreme Court found that this clause was inappropriate and that this clause, contained under Rule 9 of the 1979 service discipline and appeals, was contrary to public policy because of the inequity in the bargaining power between the parties. Some contracts that are illegal are those that violate public safety, the administration of justice, revenue fraud, corruption, etc. In this case, an important interpretation of the termination clause was made in the contract. The issue was left open because, in this case, the parties had reached a complementary agreement replacing the original agreement. In addition, the duration of the endorsement was about to expire. In this case, it was also indicated that the franchise could not be required to stick to a party that does not meet its standards by ruining its surval or its brand. For these reasons, commercial contracts can never be sustained and even if there is no termination clause in a contract, the contract may be terminated by a reasonable period of termination if the termination power of Bonafide`s exercise is sought.

[6] From the point of view of the various jurisdictions, it is relevant that, in the development of the termination clause of any contract, appropriate reflections and reflections should be carried out. In the end, the contracting parties must not downgrade the termination clauses of the contract or grant them less significantly. Justice should also take into account the justice, good faith and respective positions of the parties in determining the validity of an early termination of the contract. The Kerala High Court has attributed a more plausible meaning to the term “determinable” in T.O. Abraham v. Jose Thomas – Ors. [9] In an appeal relating to the concrete execution of a share sale agreement, the Tribunal established the following principles: (a) In order for a contract to be determined, the defendant must first demonstrate that its clauses and conditions are so that one of the parties can terminate them without justification and b) a contract that can be terminated by one of the parties according to its own will. , without giving other reasons and without giving reasons, it can be determined by nature.

In another case, before the High Court of Orissa,[12] it was found in a dealership agreement between the parties that the agreement would remain in effect for a period of five years and then continue for a consecutive year, until it was fixed by one of the parties, indicating in writing to the other party its intention to terminate the contract for three months. , in accordance with Article 56, paragraph 1, the petitioner is free to terminate the contract if the distributor has deliberately contaminated or manipulated the quality of a product of the company as such. The Tribunal found that the termination clause rendered the contract derogatory and set aside the orders of the Tribunal and the Court of Appeal that issued restraining orders in relation to the agreement.

Comments are closed.